Research & Design: ChatGPToolkit for NYU Faculty
Research & Design: ChatGPToolkit for NYU Faculty
Research • Design • App • Master's Thesis • 2024
iWITNESS
A Simulation-Based Learning App Helping Jurors Evaluate the Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony
About iWitness
Eyewitness misidentifications have been the leading contributing cause of wrongful convictions in the US. iWitness, a simulation-based learning app that enables jurors to put their own eyewitness skills to the test, hopes to shed light on the fallibility of eyewitness identifications. If jurors explore how their own biases, perception, and memories affect their ability to accurately identify suspects under various conditions, they can experience firsthand the difficulty in being an eyewitness. They can then analyze eyewitness accounts with a more critical eye. In turn, maybe fewer people would be wrongfully convicted on the basis of eyewitness testimony.
Concept Overview
Eyewitness misidentifications have been the leading contributing cause of wrongful convictions, playing a major role in about 70% of DNA exoneration cases (Rakoff & Loftus, 2018). Jurors place immense weight on eyewitness testimony, despite its fallibility. According to Jones et al. (2020), “jurors are hesitant to acquit a defendant when there is eyewitness evidence, even when that evidence is weak.” Eyewitnesses are compelling and relatable; they take time out of their day to be helpful, testifying in a stressful courtroom with seemingly little motive to lie. However, as persuasive and confident as eyewitnesses may be in their identifications, they can still be wrong.
In fact, eyewitnesses can go awry from the moment they view a crime all the way up until they testify in court (Wells & Loftus, 2013). Due to factors like stress, the presence of a weapon, post-event information, and memory deterioration (Helm, 2021), eyewitnesses can unconsciously be led astray. I hope to help jurors understand how various factors may affect the accuracy of eyewitness identifications so they can be prepared to critically examine eyewitness testimony. If jurors were aware of the potential biases, perceptual miscues, and memory issues at play for eyewitnesses in various conditions, they could scrutinize eyewitness accounts without simply accepting them at face-value. In turn, maybe fewer people would be wrongfully convicted based on the testimony of eyewitnesses.